|


An interview with Professor Low Teck
Seng
by Kim-Kyna Tan
PROFESSOR Low Teck Seng, head honcho of
the latest addition to the polytechnic family, The Republic, is
leading a revolution of the post-secondary education system.
And he is not your run-of-the-mill,
cookie cutter career academic, mind you.
The engineer who founded Singapore’s
leading national research institute specialising in magnetics and
optics relevant to data storage (the Data Storage Institute) is also a
technopreneur who runs his own enterprises and sits on the board of
several publicly-listed companies.

As an educationist and entrepreneur who
is in his element crisscrossing multi-disciplines, Prof Low must have
been a natural, de facto choice for the Ministry of Education
in its quest for a leader of the fifth and newest polytechnic.
Said the Principal and CEO of The
Republic of the first thoughts that crossed his mind when the offer
came: “I thought about the importance of the role of the polytechnic
in Singapore, in nation-building, the quality of our polytechnics, and
the importance of a fifth poly because of the social obligations we
have to young people in Singapore in terms of the need for diversity
in our tertiary education landscape,” he recounted.
“The most important thing that struck me
was the opportunity to build something very exciting because the
Ministry was willing to accept new ideas which was very much in line
with Mr Teo’s (the then Minister for Education) management of the
whole education system. The timing was also when Singapore was looking
for diversity in the tertiary education sector and economically as
well. I found a ministry that was receptive of new ideas, and with
that, the challenge. Administratively, having run the university
faculty, I saw how things could be run differently and so I took up
the challenge of starting this poly,” he continued, and added with a
chuckle, “I was employee number one.”
Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong made the
first announcement about the formation of The Republic in his 2001
National Day Rally Speech. From 1 January 2002, RP began recruiting a
handful of officers and senior management staff. The team operated
from the premises of the Data Storage Institute at NUS between January
and July 2002. Tasked with the mammoth mission of birthing Singapore's
fifth poly, Prof Low - who credits the then Minister for Education,
RAdm Teo Chee Hean for giving him the support and inspiration - began
by mapping out his own vision.
“Academically, I had a vision of what
our poly would be like. The challenge was to articulate this to the
people I was gathering around me…for them to be able to share this
vision of mine with conviction. I personally believe if anything is
worth doing, it’s worth doing well with passion,” he said.
Prof Low has 20 years of experience
under his belt, having taught students of all levels - from
undergraduate to postgraduate, and classes of all sizes from groups of
12 to 300 in a lecture theatre. “I understand class dynamics and I’ve
had years of students assessing me,” he said.
Having been there, done that, he has
intimate knowledge of progressive trends of thoughts in the realm of
technical education, and of the dos and don'ts - the pedagogical
strategies that work and the pitfalls to avoid.

“I wouldn’t say I did. Having been
involved in technical education and now given the opportunity to start
up an institution of higher learning in technical education, I had to
do a severe re-think and to look at all the new things that had come
my way through the interactions I’ve had with a lot of technical
educators in the US and Europe because of my association with IEEE,”
he said in measured tone.
He added: “I came to the conclusion that
we have to move away from the traditional lecture-tutorial system to
one which is more student-centric with a clearer emphasis on the
process without compromising on the content being delivered.”
Thus the adoption of the Problem-Based
Learning (PBL) approach. In performing the due diligence, other
alternatives were evaluated and then canned in favour of the one clear
winning formula, PBL.
“What’s most important is to find one
that works for us in Singapore. Many systems, when transported to a
different locale, will fail miserably because they’re culturally
irrelevant or because of a different blend of resources,” he
explained.
So unwavered is The Republic's faith in
PBL that it is applying it across the board i.e. 100 per cent of its
curriculum - a first for an educational institution in Singapore.
The Republic's first intake of over 800
students are empowered with self-autonomy in a learner-centred
environment and steeped in contextually-relevant and just-in-time
knowledge. This, rather than the mere regurgitation or memorisation of
facts, better equips them for the rapidly evolving world out
there. Under the PBL
paradigm, and its one-problem-a-day delivery system, learning is not a
utilitarian means to an end but a continuum that inculcates the values
of lifelong learning.

Critics of the PBL paradigm may charge
that it is unrealistic to undo years of socialisation in a
conventional classroom milieu. To naysayers, this is what Prof Low has
to say: “I don’t think it’s a question of undoing. I think it’s a
question of moving the students to a different phase. We should be
more positive and not look at it as undoing. A lecture-tutorial system
does have its merits. Even today, I do contend that our system is
good, if not better, but the other polys are also doing very well.
“A lot of work needs to be done but I
think it’s do-able. From the start, I also had the view that we cannot
build this poly ourselves - with the staff and resources from the
government. That’s why from the point I started my team, we started
working with industry and visiting companies, and by February this
year, we already had 33 partner companies. We need industry and the
community to build this,” he added.
The PBL modus operandi is reinforced by
a wireless and paperless system which streamlines and optimises all
organisational and administrative processes.
"The key for us is to exploit the
synchronous time we have with the students and the asynchronous space.
We should take advantage of the asynchronous space for them to
continue learning and interacting. It’s the same thing for management.
If we are e-connected, it doesn’t matter where we are. If you look at
trends of technology, this is something you cannot escape. Computing
will be pervasive. We also make full use of it for our administration
and infrastructure because of our paperless approach," he said.
Aligned with Singapore's aim of
nurturing its cultural capital and becoming the renaissance arts hub
of the region, both The Republic's interim campus in Tanglin and its
permanent home in Woodlands will be transformed into an epicentre for
arts and culture. There will be a flowering of events and activities
that will inject verve, variety and spice into campus life.
Said Prof Low: “The great opportunities
today are at the interfaces of disciplines. Where does science end or
begin and arts end or begin? We even talk about 'the art of
technology' these days. I think we’re evolving into a world where the
multi-disciplinary nature of systems and events makes it impossible
for us to compartmentalize subjects. Because of that, it’s important
for The Republic to move away from the traditional lecture-tutorial
system based on subjects to a more interactive and integrative
learning environment we have in RP. We have a system which is better
placed to meet the challenges of the environment we are entering or
have entered.”
In an epochal age where time and space
have been conflated to the span of a nanosecond; where man has been to
the moon and back innumerable times, and humans can be cloned in part
and in whole, the New Economy warrior needs to be highly adaptable and
technically competent. The diploma-holders and graduates of today are
confronted with new and unnerving global realities which are altering
the rules of engagement in the blink of an eye. More and more blue and
white collar jobs are being shifted to low-cost regional production
powerhouses like China and India.

“I’ve always held the view that the
system we have has an over-emphasis on analysis, and because we
classify things into different boxes, the students learn all the
tools. A tool can be used for dismantling and understanding. But tools
are actually very important for putting things together and providing
a solution. This synthesis, as opposed to analysis, is not a strength
in our system. It does not come out so obviously in a lecture-tutorial
system whereas in a PBL-based approach, this is a natural consequence
because students are always seeking solutions. And because the
teaching is contextual, it’s easier for the students to relate to. If
they see a problem, they know how to integrate information and synthesise solutions,” said Prof Low.
Turning his attention to the rows of
books lining his study, many of them familiar literary works such as
Sun Tzi's Art of War and Edward de Bono's Tactics, Prof
Low picked out Clock Speed by Charles H. Fine and said: “50
years ago, technological changes were very slow and you didn’t need to
relearn many things and you learnt things slowly. But today,
technology changes at a rapid pace, and habits and paradigms in
businesses change. In the face of these changes, the workplace changes
too. Given this scenario, it’s important that our workforce is
flexible, agile, adaptable and confident.”
Pausing for a moment to reflect, he
added: “They will also need certain attributes to have this philosophy
of continuous learning and upgrading. If you look at the PBL process,
they’re learning all the time. The process of learning is at the
centre of the pedagogical system we have adopted.”
|